XTAR vs Duracell: A Cost-Effectiveness Test for Trail Camera Batteries
In this article, I tested the XTAR 1.5V AA CLR 4300 lithium batteries and Duracell alkaline batteries in a trail camera to see which one offers best cost-effectiveness. Click to read more.
Today, we will explore which option is the most cost-effective for frequent users of trail cameras who shoot large amounts of video: rechargeable lithium-ion batteries or standard alkaline batteries.
Using the XTAR 1.5V AA CLR 4300 Lithium and the Duracell Plus AA 100% Extra Life Alkaline as examples, we will discuss the main differences, battery life, and actual usage costs between them.
Specifications
| Model | XTAR 1.5V AA CLR 4300 | Duracell Plus 100% Extra Life |
| Type | Rechargeable lithium | Primary alkaline |
| Nominal Voltage | Constant 1.5V | 1.5V (linear drop) |
| Capacity | Almost 2700mAh | Almost 2700mAh |
| Life Cycle | 1200+ | Single-use |
| Charging time | 2-4 hours | None |
| Temperature | Stable operation from -35°C to 50°C | Recommended for use above 0°C |
Advantages and Considerations
XTAR 1.5V AA CLR 4300

✅Advantages
1. Stable Voltage and Consistent Performance
The XTAR battery maintains a 1.5V constant output throughout its discharge cycle. This ensures consistent device performance and stable image brightness, without the color shifts often seen with alkaline batteries.

2. Reliable in Cold Temperatures
Unlike alkaline batteries, which lose voltage in low temperatures, XTAR lithium batteries perform well even in sub-zero conditions. In my tests at -35°C, XTAR batteries successfully recorded around 1,000 short 30-second videos.
3. Long Lifespan, Lower Long-Term Cost
In theory, XTAR batteries can be recharged up to 1,200 times, but even conservatively estimating 1,000 cycles, they can still last for many years. Considering the long-term cost, their value for money is excellent.
4. Eco-friendly
Reusable for years, with almost no waste.
6. Suitable for High-power Devices
Examples include trail cameras, camera flashes, wireless microphones, and game controllers. These devices require a stable high-voltage output, and XTAR lithium batteries significantly outperform alkaline batteries in such applications.
🔻Considerations
1. Higher initial cost due to the dedicated charger
2. Limited offline availability, mainly purchased online
Duracell Plus AA 100% Extra Life

✅Advantages
1. Low cost: Purchasing in bulk offers excellent value, and no charger is required
2. Easy Availability: Widely sold in supermarkets and convenience stores.
3. Ready to Use: Batteries can be used straight out of the package, no charging needed.
🔻Considerations
1. Limited Endurance Performance for High-power Devices
I tested the performance on two trail cameras, and the difference was striking:
- On an 850nm infrared LED camera, 4 Duracell batteries could record approximately 490 one-minute videos.
- On a 940nm high-power infrared LED camera, the same 4 batteries could only record 150 one-minute videos.
- When the temperature drops below 0°C, the voltage drops sharply, and the device may fail to start.
2. Eco-unfriendly
Single-use and require proper disposal, creating environmental concerns with heavy usage.
Practical Test: Number of Videos and Cost
I tested 4 XTAR lithium batteries and 4 Duracell alkaline batteries on the APIMP 810V infrared trail camera (940nm LED) to see how many one-minute videos each battery set could record before being completely depleted, and calculated the cost per video.
Here are the results:
- XTAR: A total of 238 one-minute videos
- Duracell: A total of 146 one-minute videos
From these data, we can calculate the per-video cost:
| Battery | Number of Videos | Price (4 batteries) | Cycle Life | Total Videos (with cycles) | Cost per Video |
| XTAR 1.5V AA CLR 4300 | 238 | €40 (including charger) | 1000-1200 | 238×1000=238000 | ≈ 0.02 cents |
| Duracell Plus AA 100% Extra Life | 146 | €4 | None | 146 | ≈ 2.7 cents |
From a cost perspective, the long-term usage cost of XTAR lithium batteries is only about 1% of Duracell alkaline batteries.
For users like me, who deploy trail cameras in the field for extended periods, this difference is extremely practical—it reduces the frequency of battery replacement and lowers ongoing maintenance costs.
Conclusion
Overall, lithium batteries such as the XTAR AA 1.5V CLR 4300 clearly stand out as the most cost-effective choice for trail cameras, thanks to their stable output, reliable performance in low temperatures, long cycle life, and long-term economic advantages.
Higher performance, lower cost —this is the greatest advantage of lithium batteries.



